This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Conboy, K.

Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development

National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
kieran.conboy{at}nuigalway.ie

Awareness and use of agile methods has grown rapidly among the information systems development (ISD) community in recent years. Like most previous methods, the development and promotion of these methods have been almost entirely driven by practitioners and consultants, with little participation from the research community during the early stages of evolution. While these methods are now the focus of more and more research efforts, most studies are still based on XP, Scrum, and other industry-driven foundations, with little or no conceptual studies of ISD agility in existence. As a result, this study proposes that there are a number of significant conceptual shortcomings with agile methods and the associated literature in its current state, including a lack of clarity, theoretical glue, parsimony, limited applicability, and naivety regarding the evolution of the concept of agility in fields outside systems development. Furthermore, this has significant implications for practitioners, rendering agile method comparison and many other activities very difficult, especially in instances such as distributed development and large teams that are not conducive to many of the commercial agile methods. This study develops a definition and formative taxonomy of agility in an ISD context, based on a structured literature review of agility across a number of disciplines, including manufacturing and management where the concept originated, matured, and has been applied and tested thoroughly over time. The application of the texonomy in practice is then demonstrated through a series of thought trials conducted in a large multinational organization. The intention is that the definition and taxonomy can then be used as a starting point to study ISD method agility regardless of whether the method is XP or Scrum, agile or traditional, complete or fragmented, out-of-the-box or in-house, used as is or tailored to suit the project context.

Key Words: agile; systems development; conceptual research; agile manufacturing; agile management
History: This paper was received on June 1, 2007.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. D. Austin and L. Devin Research Commentary--Weighing the Benefits and Costs of Flexibility in Making Software: Toward a Contingency Theory of the Determinants of Development Process Design Information Systems Research, September 1, 2009; 20(3): 462 - 477. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Maruping, V. Venkatesh, and R. Agarwal A Control Theory Perspective on Agile Methodology Use and Changing User Requirements Information Systems Research, September 1, 2009; 20(3): 377 - 399. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. Harris, R. W. Collins, and A. R. Hevner Control of Flexible Software Development Under Uncertainty Information Systems Research, September 1, 2009; 20(3): 400 - 419. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Sarker and S. Sarker Exploring Agility in Distributed Information Systems Development Teams: An Interpretive Study in an Offshoring Context Information Systems Research, September 1, 2009; 20(3): 440 - 461. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Vidgen and X. Wang Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development Information Systems Research, September 1, 2009; 20(3): 355 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]