Information Systems Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH,
Published online in Articles in Advance, May 12, 2009
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1080.0217
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Whinston, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Interaction Between Knowledge Codification and Knowledge-Sharing Networks

De Liu, Gautam Ray, Andrew B. Whinston

University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712

de.liu{at}uky.edu
rayxx153{at}umn.edu
abw{at}uts.cc.utexas.edu

Current knowledge management (KM) technologies and strategies advocate two different approaches: knowledge codification and knowledge-sharing networks. However, the extant literature has paid limited attention to the interaction between them. This research draws on the literature on formal modeling of networks to examine the interaction between knowledge codification and knowledge-sharing networks. The analysis suggests that an increase in codification may damage existing network-sharing ties. Anticipating that, individuals may hoard their knowledge to protect their network ties, even when there are nontrivial rewards for codification. We find that despite the aforementioned tension between the codification and the network approach, a firm may still benefit from combining the two approaches. Specifically, when the future sharing potential between knowledge workers is high, a combination of the two approaches may outperform a codification-only or a network-only approach because the codification reward causes fewer network ties to break down, and the benefit from increased codification can offset the loss of some network ties. However, when the future sharing potential is low, an increase in codification reward can quickly break down the whole network. Thus, firms may be better off by pursuing a codification-only or a network-only strategy.

Key Words: knowledge management; codification; knowledge-sharing network; sharing potential
History: This paper was received on April 20, 2006.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.